4 February 2006 - 10:38am
Pro-criminalization website doesn't heart Hillary, despite the cash
The strident right-wing e-rag with the ironic title "Life News" really really hates Hillary Clinton, even though she gave $10,000 to pro-criminalization candidate Bob Casey, Jr.'s campaign to win the Democratic nomination for Pennsylvania's open vulnerable Senate seat this year. Why?
Because they love strict father Rick Santorum, who has unshakable bigotry and misogyny credentials, more. And because Hillary is married to Bill, that unwashed boy from the South who dared rise above his station and become a part of the ruling class. (The good ol' boys are supposed to vet all new entries to the club, and Bill did not even apply. Damn inconvenient sometimes, this democracy thing.)
According to the Post, their campaign blasts Casey as a "Republican-lite on women's issues" and bashed it as a "calculated effort by party leaders to build a so-called 'bigger tent' at the expense of women's rights."
But the reason for Clinton's donation may have nothing to do with abortion.
Casey is running against pro-life Republican Sen. Rick Santorum, a Clinton nemesis. Santorum drew Clinton's ire after he published a rebuttal book to her "It Takes a Village to Raise a Child." Santorum's was titled "It Takes a Family."
A white, straight family with none of them queers or coloreds. Yeah. "Tell your neighbor to fuck off," is the Santorum way. Community? Neighborhood? The folks next door? They don't fit into Santorum's values system. There's no room for a metaphorical village in the radical right's view. Not when they're running the federal government and now have the power to invade people's lives. (Is spying on Americans a family value, too?)
But let's back up a sec. Why the hell is Hillary giving money to Casey during the primary, when he's running against candidates who favor reproductive rights?
Meanwhile, HillPAC spokeswoman Ann Lewis, a noted abortion advocate, told the Post, "Sen. Clinton is committed to electing Democrats through contributions and campaigning on their behalf."
Should Casey defeat Santorum, which is a possibility given his 10 percentage point lead in the polls, it would aide Democratic efforts to recapture the Senate in the November elections.
For Clinton, supporting abortion is still a salient issue and she proved her credentials again with her recent vote against Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito. Not only did she vote against Alito's nomination, she backed a filibuster engaged in by a handful of the most ardent pro-abortion members of the party.
About Alito, Clinton said "He will intensify his campaign to roll back" abortion rights granted in the Roe v. Wade decision.
Of course, Casey already announced that he thinks Alito would do a heckuva job.
So what kind of Democratic Party is Hillary trying to build, anyway?
Similar entries
store
Buy stuff here.





















Comments
is interesting to follow. Her early "seed" money in primary races, hers goes to the conservative candidates. Salazar for one. And obviously her money is signal for other money to gather.
Frankly I am starting to think Hillary dials Dobson too. Hell Tony Perkins as well. Who knows. The ''one party'' is The National Prayer Breakfast Party with Bono as party favor.
That is why I usually call her ''Hillpac''.
But then I cannot stand either Clinton... and if they ever send Jenna and Barbara to Iraq, please send Chelsea as well. Goose / gander.
Mediagirl,
You've written about me before, and I urge your readers to check out an interview that Jane conducted with me at http://www.aboveavgjane.blogspot.com/.
I am pro-choice (always have been, always will be), pro-gay marriage, pro-drug decriminalization, pro-embryonic stem cell research and pro-gun control. My views are all on my Website.
I intend to give Rick Santorum a run for the money in *his* party.
John Featherman
Republican Candidate, US Senate-PA
www.featherman.com
...but how will you stay faithful? Politicians on BOTH sides of the ailse say anything to get voters into bed... but ditch them once they are elected. As tempting as this sound I cannot see how ANY Republican can buck their party's status quo. Your party is hijacked by fundamentalist and that is where they are not onhly pushing the party but the whole country.
the kind of party that aquires power for hil.
hil's the worst kind of opportunist. the ends justify the means for that woman.
and hey, are there any pro-choice democrats left?
nothing but anti-choice dems these days.
oh, and chickenshit dems. like those senators led by that fuctard, harry reid.
well, dont bother counting my vote, boyos.
i'm sitting the next two elections out.
democrats can go pound sand.
Anon: I am pro-choice, and I have a long history of having that as my number one political issue. Visit my Website. Check out my views. Google me, and find out my personal story. You can rest assured my views will not change when I get into office.
Bayprairie: Please don't sit out any elections. I agree with you that Harry Reid and Bob Casey don't hold socially liberal views, and it's sad when parties back the wrong candidates simply to build a party. A party that stands for nothing is worthless. What I'd encourage you to do, Bayprairie, is to either cause change from within the party, or leave the party and influence things in the Republican Party (as I am), the Green Party, the Libertarian Party, or just become an independent. But please don't drop out. You have great views. Don't be afraid to rock the boat. Make your vote count even if you write in NOTA -- none of the above.
John Featherman
Republican Candidate, US Senate-PA
www.featherman.com