22 April 2005 - 5:21pm
Is loving your vagina offensive? Disruptive?
Two Winona, MN Students Suspended for Wearing Vagina Monologues Buttons
There has been very heated debate over this matter for the past two days. I've been suprised by the lack of support--particularly from people who align themselves with liberal causes.
The buttons have been called pointless, disruptive, vulgar, and a cry for attention. First of all, there is a definite point to the buttons. Women are taught from a young age to fear their vaginas. Women are encouraged by corporations and by society to hide their periods--feminine products keep getting smaller and they are even making the wrappers 'silent' now. Heaven forbid another women in a restroom hear the familiar sound of a tampax wrapper! The point is, having your period and having a vagina is natural. There is nothing gross or disgusting about it. Why are women taught to be uncomfortable about their own genitals?
Perhaps more importantly, why is a button that is counteracting such negative body image being seen as so inappropriate in a high school setting? Relatively recently, mainstream media has paid attention to the fact that teenage girls have low self-esteem and that low self-esteem can cause all kinds of problems. Teenage girls also suffer from body image issues (a direct result of media that shames the female body). Why is a teenage girl letting other teenage girls know that she loves her vagina--perhaps the most controversial and passively despised part of a young girls body--so wrong?
Because it is disruptive? People learn about vaginas in various high school level classes. The fact that women have vaginas shouldn't be a suprise to anyone in high school. People have alleged that such a button is inappropriate in a high school setting because high schools are full of horny boys. The very simple fact is that young women and girls need to deal with the fact that they have vaginas and boys don't need to be out-of-control balls of hormones.
The teenage drive for sex is due, in part, to hormones. Girls go through this too. The fact is that our society teaches young men that being sexually active and showing that you have a libido is masculine--a mark of 'true' manhood. It makes sense, given this knowledge that teenage boys, who are entering or new to manhood, would be driven to prove themselves. That doesn't make it right.
There is nothing vulgar about the word vagina in and of itself. As a matter of fact, there is nothing vulgar about sex, female desire, yeast infections, or menstruation. These are all facts of life. Vagina is not a profane word.
These girls are not treating this incident as a cry for help. Every interview has shown them to be intelligent, eloquent, and genuinely interested in the Vagina Monologues. What gives?
If a button that says "I (heart) my vagina" isn't appropriate in a high-school setting--I think the reasoning behind such a decision warrants explanation.
Granted, I do understand that Supreme Court precedents have said that public schools can control what a student can and cannot wear. Schools have a right to deem certain things obscene and deem other things acceptable. But where is the reasoning? Perhaps if someone would provide a straight-answer about why this is offensive, vulgar, or inappropriate I would be satisfied. Just because a school has the power doesn't mean they are in the right.
Similar entries
store
Buy stuff here.



















Comments
I know this is hard to believe, but Mike Adams who writes at Townhall.com and is a college professor at UNC claims that all this vagina talk makes him soft.
"Worse than the discovery that I am now suffering from ED was the subsequent realization that I have been suffering from it for several years. Ever the empiricist, I decided to record the approximate dates of my previous, shall we say, difficulties in an effort to find the root causes of my medical condition. A brief summary follows:
In 2001, I was jogging on campus when I passed a group of feminists marching in the annual “Take back the night� event. After they marched by me shaking their fists and screaming, I first experienced ED. They certainly took back that night!
In 2002, I read the book “Intimate Reading� by a feminist professor in the English Department at UNC-Wilmington. After I read the section about her losing her virginity at age 16 (told in graphic detail), I again experienced ED.
In 2003 (February), when campus feminists marched around stage chanting “vagina, vagina� during the Vagina Monologues, I experienced ED again. Even worse, it happened to me on Valentine’s Day (which, by the way, is not known as VD)!
In 2003 (March), when the university hired a self-proclaimed “queer Muslim� speaker named Irshad Manji, I experienced by most intense bout with ED. In some ways, I’m still recovering.
In 2004, I saw a campus feminist (student) wearing a shirt that read “f*** Bush.� It wasn’t really the shirt that gave me ED. It was probably the leather combat boots and dog collar she was wearing. I even thought about calling animal control.
And, finally, in 2005, I have now suffered from ED due to a feminist’s excessive complaints about her husband’s ED. It’s kind of like trying not to imagine a giant purple elephant."
Yep.. this guy can't get a hard on if there are women with vaginas running around!
My goodness! So this guy can get hard only if he can beat and rape women? I'm glad he's impotent! What's frightening is that this will only enrage him more, making him all the more likely to act out on his power fantasies. Does he need Viagra? Or Thorazine?
I followed the above link over to Mike's column from Blondesense and left this comment, I discount ED and assume that Mike is a repressed rightwing gay man.
I think all this obsession with gayness by the GOP rightwing, is because the GOP right-wing is loaded with gay men. Today we have the news that Jeff Gannon checked into the White House over 200 times, and many times when there was no news conferences, and didn't check-out on many ocassions, all suggests he was plying his professional trade in the white house, with only a few possible individuals as clients. Many, many WH and GOP high-command are known to frequent gay bars, and many are rummored to be gay.
Mike,
It looks like you have issues about your sexuality because you go "limp" around girls. Have you considered taking your problems to an expert like "Bulldog" Jeff Gannon, I think he could help you come to grips with your female side. You have repressed your gayness too long, and need to come out of the closet and show yourself to be a real man. Then you'll stop writing all that whiney crap!